Is it possible that Jackson's just "affectionate?" 

Comments

As defined in the Bill Clinton Impeachment Proceedings: 1. Oral Touching is not SEX..... 2. Masterbation is not SEX.................SEX is when a male and a female are engaged in copulation. ............... All the rest is not SEX. .......................I stand corrected regarding the name Abrhams used the Dennis Kid. I was referring to Jordan Chambers the first accuser. It was his statement that sounds like a female wrote it using the words Climax and Masterbation.

THAT KIDS NAME THAT DAN ABRAMS STATED ON TV HAS BEEN AVAILABLE ONLINE FOR 9 YEARS. ..................................ALONG WITH THE SO-CALLED SWORN STATEMENT MADE BY HIM, WHICH I DOUBT WAS IN HIS WORDS..............NOTHING NEW, ANYONE THAT WANTED TO KNOW WHAT HIS STATEMENT WAS OR HIS NAME COULD GET IT AS EASY AS THE NEXT PERSON. ..........................LIKE I STATED BEFORE, IT IS ALL BY DESIGN! TO MAKE THE ATTORNEYS RICH. ....................IF A POLITICIAN EVER GOES TO COURT, SHOULD THE JUDGE ALLOW PAST ACCUSATIONS ALLOWED INTO THE CASE? ........................... SEEMS A TRAIL WOULD GO ON FOR A DECADE IF THAT BE THE CASE................. WONDER HOW MANY ACCUSATIONS WERE MADE OF THE PRIOR PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON?

Are the Attorneys for Jackson competent? Surely they have a CLUE that: 1. The statement that NANCY GRACE showed to Jesse Jackson and the entire World on TV last night has been online for 9 years. IT IS WAY OLD NEWS! 2. The same exact Attorney that handled one of the other cases is the current accusers Attorney, allowing information from that so-called case to be privy to the current litigants. Are Jackson's Attorneys that far out of TOUCH that they have not countered that the statements made by any accuser in the past 10 years is TAINTED testimony, due to the ease of availibility of that statement online The Judge allowing the statement from the 12 yr old accuser from 10 years ago is a JOKE! The Jury and this Judge must be a group of 12 people that have never had Internet Access! 1. The so-called statement made by the accuser from 10 years ago is a hoax. 2. That document has been available on line for 9 years or more. Anyone could have access to that statement, read it and make up a story similar to it. Especially a current CLIENT of the past accusers attorney. DUH! 3. What 12 yr old boy uses terms like "Climax" and "Masterbation", they say jacked or jerked off. Climax is a word used by FEMALES, not guys. Sounds like someones secretary wrote this statement. 4. No criminal charges were filed against Jackson in any of the previous attempts. Therefore, how can a Judge allow those events to be introduced into a criminal case. Prior Bad Acts should be limited to convictions, not accusations. The Legislature, which is made up of attorneys and friends of attorneys and the Courts make laws that defy normal human behavior. NO LAW AGAINST HAVING SEX WITH A FAT WOMAN IS THERE? AND NO LAWS AGAINST CONSUMING THE WORST BOTTOM OF THE BARRELL DRUGS, TOBACCO AND ALCOHOL.. There are laws however against designer drugs, the ones people enjoy using because they don't kill you like Tobacco or Alcohol. Therefore, they know people will commit these acts, and the Courts, Attorneys and Judges get RICH prosecuting and defending the person that lands in their gig. It is a trap that has been set, and they have it all planned out and designed long before a search warrant is ever sworn out. Then they all go to the Country Club and have a big steak dinner, after they buy new SUV's and Boats laughing about the entire deal. Notice lately they are mainly charging RICH people with crimes, because they don't make any money off of the poor people, that costs them money. Those women on Court TV look like they are Jealous that none of them ever got any from McCully Culkin!

No. Thats how paedophiles work, they are overly affectionate and break down your barriers so the next step in the abuse seems like no big deal.

Maybe it was my imagination, but I think that I heard Dan Abrams slip up and say the name of Michael Jackson's accuser on his show "The Abrams Report" last night (Thursday, March 10, 2005). He was preaching to the panelists and said, "Here is a quote from the 15-year old boy, Dennis (Last Name - which I didn't catch)." Has anyone else commented on this elsewhere?

Add Comment